![The SANAD II study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of valproate versus levetiracetam for newly diagnosed generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, phase 4, randomised controlled trial - The Lancet The SANAD II study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of valproate versus levetiracetam for newly diagnosed generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, phase 4, randomised controlled trial - The Lancet](https://els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/cms/attachment/3188c36b-9a69-4509-9116-c8797795272b/gr1.gif)
The SANAD II study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of valproate versus levetiracetam for newly diagnosed generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, phase 4, randomised controlled trial - The Lancet
![PDF] Bias was reduced in an open-label trial through the removal of subjective elements from the outcome definition. | Semantic Scholar PDF] Bias was reduced in an open-label trial through the removal of subjective elements from the outcome definition. | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/814ad6ccbfa9defca4d2b00c4672f9070cf6b8da/16-Figure1-1.png)
PDF] Bias was reduced in an open-label trial through the removal of subjective elements from the outcome definition. | Semantic Scholar
![Statistical controversies in clinical research: limitations of open-label studies assessing antiangiogenic therapies with regard to evaluation of vascular adverse drug events—a meta-analysis - Annals of Oncology Statistical controversies in clinical research: limitations of open-label studies assessing antiangiogenic therapies with regard to evaluation of vascular adverse drug events—a meta-analysis - Annals of Oncology](https://els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/cms/attachment/4ba8a139-a98a-4306-9ae7-443a9ad74d47/gr1_lrg.jpg)
Statistical controversies in clinical research: limitations of open-label studies assessing antiangiogenic therapies with regard to evaluation of vascular adverse drug events—a meta-analysis - Annals of Oncology
![Epidemiology Clinical Trials Outline Basic principles Biases Ethics- GCP Statistical analysis Ethics. - ppt download Epidemiology Clinical Trials Outline Basic principles Biases Ethics- GCP Statistical analysis Ethics. - ppt download](https://images.slideplayer.com/24/7083739/slides/slide_30.jpg)
Epidemiology Clinical Trials Outline Basic principles Biases Ethics- GCP Statistical analysis Ethics. - ppt download
Francisco Marty, MD on Twitter: "Here is a first table comparing some basic design characteristics between #ACTT1 and #SolidarityTrial - major difference the open-label design in Solidarity vs. concealed allocation and double-blind
![Statistical controversies in clinical research: limitations of open-label studies assessing antiangiogenic therapies with regard to evaluation of vascular adverse drug events—a meta-analysis - Annals of Oncology Statistical controversies in clinical research: limitations of open-label studies assessing antiangiogenic therapies with regard to evaluation of vascular adverse drug events—a meta-analysis - Annals of Oncology](https://els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/cms/attachment/c320f1a5-f46f-43c4-8676-4a37f0a403f0/gr3_lrg.jpg)
Statistical controversies in clinical research: limitations of open-label studies assessing antiangiogenic therapies with regard to evaluation of vascular adverse drug events—a meta-analysis - Annals of Oncology
![PDF) Reducing bias in open-label trials where blinded outcome assessment is not feasible: Strategies from two randomised trials PDF) Reducing bias in open-label trials where blinded outcome assessment is not feasible: Strategies from two randomised trials](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/268789313_Reducing_bias_in_open-label_trials_where_blinded_outcome_assessment_is_not_feasible_Strategies_from_two_randomised_trials/links/5484590f0cf2e5f7ceacccd0/largepreview.png)
PDF) Reducing bias in open-label trials where blinded outcome assessment is not feasible: Strategies from two randomised trials
![Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis | The BMJ Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis | The BMJ](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/366/bmj.l5221/F3.medium.jpg)
Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis | The BMJ
![Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis | The BMJ Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis | The BMJ](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/366/bmj.l5221/F1.medium.jpg)
Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis | The BMJ
![PDF] The Clinical Viewpoint: Definitions, Limitations of RECIST, Practical Considerations of Measurement | Semantic Scholar PDF] The Clinical Viewpoint: Definitions, Limitations of RECIST, Practical Considerations of Measurement | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/0d341492d445073e64d1ccb6985e4ad763a3d1f7/2-Table1-1.png)
PDF] The Clinical Viewpoint: Definitions, Limitations of RECIST, Practical Considerations of Measurement | Semantic Scholar
![Ash Paul a Twitter: "@das_seed @d_s_thakur @giridar100 @prat1112001 @PriyankaPulla @deralteGaukler @malini_aisola @namita_kohli @NIH @ICMRDELHI @ivanoransky @MicrobiomDigest @amarjesani @AnantBhan @CDSCO_INDIA_INF @spkalantri @BioconBiologics ... Ash Paul a Twitter: "@das_seed @d_s_thakur @giridar100 @prat1112001 @PriyankaPulla @deralteGaukler @malini_aisola @namita_kohli @NIH @ICMRDELHI @ivanoransky @MicrobiomDigest @amarjesani @AnantBhan @CDSCO_INDIA_INF @spkalantri @BioconBiologics ...](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ef1j0cWXYAAPEQy.png)